Abstract
A primary initiative of the Philippines’ Rodrigo Duterte’s presidency was the national campaign against drug users and criminals. During the turbulent period that was Duterte’s presidency, journalists who published dissenting views on the drug war frequently became targets of Duterte’s administration, which came in the form of frivolous charges, arrests, banning media outlets, or in some instances, murder. This Comment argues that the Philippines violated international law protections of freedom of expression as codified in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. As a party to this treaty, the Philippines, under Duterte’s administration, unjustifiably restricted speech in an attempt to restrict oppositional opinions and the public’s access to information. Further, this Comment recommends four possible paths to remedy, most notably that journalists impacted by the Philippines’ restrictions on speech should submit complaints to the Human Rights Committee.
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons