Abstract
At midnight on Friday, December 15, 2017, a century of multilateral negotiations over the definition and jurisdictional reach of the crime of aggression—leadership responsibility for aggressive war—was on the brink of collapse. Almost every controversial drafting issue had been negotiated and resolved, and International Criminal Court (ICC or the Court) States Parties were gathered at the United Nations (U.N.) in New York to activate ICC jurisdiction over the “supreme international crime.” According to aggression scholar Annegret Hartig, “activation was expected to be comparable to a mere turning on of lights.” Just two states, the U.K. and France, were blocking the final resolution unless the gathering deleted boilerplate language reaffirming “the judicial independence of the judges of the Court.”
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, International Law Commons