Abstract
Responding to fears of violence and liability on K-12 campuses, local school boards and superintendents have made on-site or embedded school police omnipresent in American public schools. Yet, very little attention is paid to the many costs associated with their presence. When situating law enforcement’s presence squarely in the racist history of policing and school policing, the juxtaposition with the civic purpose of public education reveals significant constitutional costs. This Article builds on existing scholarship by bringing attention to the conflict between the First, Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments and the dimensions of embedded school police. Ultimately, schools must balance their responsibility to protect students entrusted to them by parents and guardians with those students’ individual rights, such as the right to privacy. While current policing practices in schools do not per se violate precedent, the Court could and should overturn precedent in light of the changing face of school security in American schools. Adequate action by the Court would protect schoolchildren’s constitutional rights. Finally, the Article elevates evidence-based alternatives to embedded school police that promote safe and positive school climates.
Included in
Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons
