![[Florida v. Jardines] The Distortions of Implied Artistic License](https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_bk_contributions/1393/thumbnail.jpg)
[Florida v. Jardines] The Distortions of Implied Artistic License
Editors
M.C. Mirow and Howard M. Wasserman
Files
Description
This Chapter explores Fourth Amendment law and history through the lens of Xavier Cortada’s painting inspired by Florida v. Jardines. At its core, Jardines is a case about the future of Fourth Amendment interpretation and how different doctrinal theories should best protect an individual’s home from unreasonable searches and seizures. Written by Justice Antonin Scalia with his characteristic irreverence, flair, and self-confidence, Jardines is a case about fundamental questions of privacy and security that turns on the constitutional significance of a police dog sniffing outside your home.
ISBN
9789004445598
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004445598_014
Publication Date
12-21-2020
Book Title
Painting Constitutional Law: Xavier Cortada’s Images of Constitutional Rights
First Page
234
Last Page
250
Publisher
Brill
Series
Legal History Library
Keywords
Constitutional Law, Fourth Amendment, 4th Amendment, Search & Seizure
Disciplines
Constitutional Law | Criminal Procedure | Law
Recommended Citation
Ferguson, Andrew Guthrie, "[Florida v. Jardines] The Distortions of Implied Artistic License" (2020). Contributions to Books. 313.
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_bk_contributions/313