Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
First Page
1
Last Page
32
Abstract
Stanford University, The Hoover Institution (Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security and Law Essay Series) American University Washington College of Law Research Paper No. 2013-11 Columbia Public Law Research Paper 13-351 Abstract: Public debate is heating up over the future development of autonomous weapon systems. Some concerned critics portray that future, often invoking science-fiction imagery, as a plain choice between a world in which those systems are banned outright and a world of legal void and ethical collapse on the battlefield. Yet an outright ban on autonomous weapon systems, even if it could be made effective, trades whatever risks autonomous weapon systems might pose in war for the real, if less visible, risk of failing to develop forms of automation that might make the use of force more precise and less harmful for civilians caught near it. Grounded in a more realistic assessment of technology — acknowledging what is known and what is yet unknown — as well as the interests of the many international and domestic actors involved, this paper outlines a practical alternative: the gradual evolution of codes of conduct based on traditional legal and ethical principles governing weapons and warfare.
Recommended Citation
Kenneth Anderson & Matthew Waxman,
Law and Ethics for Autonomous Weapon Systems: Why a Ban Won't Work and How the Laws of War Can,
Stanford University, The Hoover Institution (Jean Perkins Task Force on National Security and Law Essay Series)
1
(2013).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1892