Document Type


Publication Date



Denver Law Review





First Page


Last Page



Current unprecedented levels of secrecy in civil discovery create significant negative externalities by preventing our adversary system from measuring up to the broad public goals that justify it. First, excessive discovery secrecy undermines the courts and the public’s ability to correct distortions of the truth-seeking function of the adversary system caused by excessive partisanship and confirmation bias. Second, it weakens the adversary system’s promotion of liberal democratic values, such as transparency and self-government. Third, it threatens the adversary system’s role in upholding human dignity, understood either as respect or status. To correct the negative externalities caused by excessive discovery secrecy, courts must stop rubber-stamping proposed stipulated protective orders and confidentiality agreements. Instead, they must assert their authority to oversee discovery by carefully balancing the parties’ legitimate needs for confidentiality against countervailing public interests in disclosing discovery materials, whether or not the parties oppose confidentiality. Courts should also consider bringing back, or even expanding, filing requirements for certain discovery materials.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.