Abstract
This Comment will describe what the Walker Process Doctrine is and explain the jurisdictional state of the Federal Circuit. Next, this Comment will examine the impact Gunn v. Minton has had on the scope of the Federal Circuit’s jurisdiction, the support and criticisms of Federal Circuit jurisdiction over Walker Process appeals, and how the Grable test plays into this issue. To do this, it will focus on how the jurisdictional analysis changed after Gunn and will discuss where each court’s argument for and against jurisdiction has merit and where it falters. To advance a solution, this Comment will recommend a compromise for determining Federal Circuit jurisdiction over Walker Process appeals.
COinS