Chapter 11. Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 US 321 (1977)
Files
Description
What would United States Supreme Court opinions look like if key decisions on gender issues were written with a feminist perspective? Feminist Judgments brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, the most significant US Supreme Court cases on gender from the 1800s to the present day. The twenty-five opinions in this volume demonstrate that judges with feminist viewpoints could have changed the course of the law. The rewritten decisions reveal that previously accepted judicial outcomes were not necessary or inevitable and demonstrate that feminist reasoning increases the judicial capacity for justice. Feminist Judgments opens a path for a long overdue discussion of the real impact of judicial diversity on the law as well as the influence of perspective on judging.
- Contains contributions from more than 50 feminist scholars and lawyers, so readers will learn about feminist reasoning from experienced writers and thinkers
- People interested in the Supreme Court, politics, feminism and women's studies will gain from varied and informed perspectives through a feminist lens
ISBN
9781316411254
Publication Date
8-2016
Book Title
Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court
First Page
208
Last Page
227
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Keywords
Civil Rights, Title VII, Supreme Court
Disciplines
Civil Rights and Discrimination | Law
Recommended Citation
Smith, Brenda; Ontiveros, Maria L.; Stanchi, Kathryn M.; Berger, Linda L.; and Crawford, Bridget J., "Chapter 11. Dothard v. Rawlinson, 433 US 321 (1977)" (2016). Contributions to Books. 196.
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_bk_contributions/196