Empirical Methods in Merger Analysis: Econometric Analysis of Pricing in FTC v. Staples
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
January 2006
Volume
13
Issue
2
First Page
265
Last Page
279
Abstract
In 1997, the US Federal Trade Commission challenged the proposed merger of two office supply superstores, Staples and Office Depot in US District Court. Both the government and merging parties presented econometric studies examining the merger's likely impact on consumer pricing, predicting a price increase of 8.6% and 0.9% respectively. This article uses the extensive public record to provide a detailed discussion of the econometric models used in the case and to show how differences between the models led to the discrepancy between these estimates.
Recommended Citation
Jonathan Baker, Orley Ashenfelter, David Ashmore, Suzanne Gleason & Daniel Hosken,
Empirical Methods in Merger Analysis: Econometric Analysis of Pricing in FTC v. Staples,
13
International Journal of the Economics of Business
265
(2006).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1909