Journal

Cornell Law Review

Volume

111

Abstract

This Article traces the intellectual history of copyright law’s fair use doctrine at the Supreme Court from its first encounter with fair use to its landmark decision slightly more than three decades ago in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Campbell provided courts with a coherent, user-centered theory for applying the four statutory fair use factors provided under 17 U.S.C. § 107, a standard the Court recently ratified in Google LLC v. Oracle Am., Inc. and Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith. As one of three related articles, this Article advances two principal claims to contribute to the intellectual history of fair use.

This Article demonstrates how contested the role of fair use in copyright law had been both before and after Congress codified the doctrine in 1976 until Campbell. Some parties and Justices treated fair use as a narrow doctrine, limited by presumptions against its application. Others understood the doctrine to be a central counterbalance to copyright law’s exclusive rights. By carefully analyzing the Court’s fair use jurisprudence up to, and including, Campbell, this Article shows that the Court and counsel appearing before it went through a learning process about fair use. In particular, until Campbell, the Court had not fully appreciated the impact of fair use’s codification or the need for the Court to provide lower courts with a coherent theory for applying the four fair use factors in § 107.

This Article’s second claim rebuts recent attempts by some courts and commentators to construe Campbell narrowly in the wake of the Court’s Warhol decision. As of this writing, these revisionist arguments have been submitted in two currently pending appellate cases, one in the Ninth Circuit and the other in the Tenth Circuit. By analyzing both the public filings and the now-public internal case files of some of the Justices, this Article provides several new insights to support the case for reading Campbell capaciously. Indeed, Campbell’s adoption of the transformative use standard reflects the hard-won triumph of an important idea about the role of fair use in copyright law.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.