Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2018
Journal
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
Volume
24
Issue
2
Abstract
Peace negotiators often face the difficult decision of whether to pursue peace at the potential cost of achieving justice, or to pursue justice at the potential cost of achieving near term peace. There are abiding ethical and moral debates surrounding this tension between peace and justice. In Syria—where the death toll has exceeded 470,000, 11 million have been displaced, and there are over 14,000 documented cases of torture to the point of death—the peace versus justice debate is a living dilemma with which negotiators are currently grappling. This article strives to examine a timely facet of this multidimensional puzzle: how to successfully accommodate the desire for justice by artfully weaving tenets of accountability into a peace process, without undermining a peace process.
Recommended Citation
Paul Williams, Lisa Dicker & C. Danae Paterson,
The Peace vs. Justice Debate and the Syrian Crisis,
24
ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law
(2018).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1255
Included in
Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons